CAD API comparison: what you can automate in Solid Edge, SolidWorks, Inventor, CATIA and Siemens NX
Which interface each CAD system offers, which languages it supports and where the differences matter for automation and AI projects.
Our own publications on CAD, PLM and AI, and screen recordings of real AI steps in CAD.

Which interface each CAD system offers, which languages it supports and where the differences matter for automation and AI projects.

When iLogic rules are enough to automate variants, drawings, BOMs, iProperties and Vault tasks in Inventor, and when an add-in on the Inventor API pays off.

How to check company design rules and standards in Autodesk Inventor automatically: iLogic, the Inventor API, a release gate in Vault, a check report and the role of AI.

How iParts, iAssemblies, model states, iLogic and Vault handle the variants of a standard product platform in Autodesk Inventor, and when a configurator is worth building.

What belongs in a requirements list, how demands and wishes differ, how to keep the list current and where AI helps without taking the decision.

How the type libraries, add-ins and external programs of the Solid Edge API work in Solid Edge 2026, which tasks to automate first and where projects stumble.

Where the Solid Edge and SolidWorks APIs differ in object model, macros, add-ins, variants and PDM, and what that means for an automation or AI project.

How a shape search across the existing part library avoids duplicate parts and needless modelling work.

What has to be in place in master data, release states and interfaces before an AI assistant can answer reliably.




Tell us which question about CAD, PLM or AI you would like answered. We write about what engineers actually ask us.